Site icon Rxharun

Appendicitis Early Signs Symptoms, Causes, Surgery

Appendicitis Early Signs Symptoms,

Appendicitis Early Signs Symptoms, Causes, Surgery/Appendicitis is an inflammation of the appendix that may lead to an abscess, ileus, peritonitis, or death if untreated. Appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency. The current standard treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis is usually surgery, but there has been increasing evidence published on the use of antibiotics.

Appendicitis is inflammation of the vermiform appendix. This is a hollow organ located at the tip of the cecum, usually in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. The appendix develops embryonically at the fifth week. During this time there is a movement of the midgut to the external umbilical cord with the eventual return to the abdomen and rotation of the cecum. This results in the usual retrocecal location of the appendix. It is most often a disease of acute presentation, usually within 24 hours, but it can also present as a more chronic condition. If there has been a perforation with a contained abscess, then the presenting symptoms can be more indolent. The exact function of the appendix has been a debated topic. Today it is accepted that this organ may have an immunoprotective function and acts as a lymphoid organ especially in the younger person. Other theories contend that the appendix acts as a storage vessel for “good” colonic bacteria. Still, others argue that it is a mear developmental remnant and has no real function.

Anatomy of Appendicitis

The vermiform appendix is a tubular structure attached to the base of the caecum at the confluence of the taeniae coli. It is approximately 8-10 cm long in adults and represents the underdeveloped distal end of the large caecum seen in other animals. In humans it is regarded as a vestigial organ, and acute inflammation of this structure is called acute appendicitis

Direct and indirect (secondary) signs of acute appendicitis in graded-compression, real-time US, colour Doppler and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS; adopted according to references 7, 9, 20 and 21)

Appendicitis Early Signs Symptoms

A blockage in the lining of the appendix that results in infection is the likely cause of appendicitis. The bacteria multiply rapidly, causing the appendix to become inflamed, swollen and filled with pus. If not treated promptly, the appendix can rupture.

There are numerous issues that can cause appendix luminal blockage, including:

Appendicitis can have more than one cause, and in many cases, the cause is not clear. Possible causes include

Appendicitis can cause serious complications, such as:

Symptoms of Appendicitis

Classically, appendicitis presents as an initial generalized or periumbilical abdominal pain that then localizes to the right lower quadrant. Initially, as the visceral afferent nerve fibers at T8 through T10 are stimulated, and this leads to vague centralized pain. As the appendix becomes more inflamed and the adjacent parietal peritoneum is irritated, the pain becomes more localized to the right lower quadrant. Pain may or may not be accompanied by any of the following symptoms:

Symptoms can be different for each person and can seem like the following conditions that also cause pain in the abdomen:

As inflammation progresses, signs of peritoneal inflammation develop. Signs include:

Other associated signs such as psoas sign (pain on external rotation or passive extension of the right hip suggesting retrocecal appendicitis) or obturator sign (pain on internal rotation of the right hip suggesting pelvic appendicitis) are rare.

Real-time US signs of acute appendicitis
Direct signsIndirect signs
  • Non-compressibility of the appendix ,Perforation: appendix might be compressible
  • Free fluid surrounding appendix
  • The diameter of the appendix > 6 mm
  • Local abscess formation
  • Single wall thickness ≥ 3 mm
  • Increased echogenicity of local mesenteric fat
Target sign:
  • Hypoechoic fluid-filled lumen
  • Hyperechoic mucosa/submucosa
  • Hypoechoic muscular layer
  • Enlarged local mesenteric lymph nodes
Appendicolith: hyperechoic with posterior shadowing
  • Thickening of the peritoneum
  • Colour Doppler and the contrast-enhanced US:
  • Hypervascularity in the early stages of AA
  • Hypo- to avascularity in abscess and necrosis
  • Signs of secondary small bowel obstruction

Diagnosis of Appendicitis

Clinical

Investigation of acute appendicitis

Differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Surgical

Urological

Gynaecological

Medical

Imaging and diagnosis of acute appendicitis

InvestigationDiagnostic criteriaEvidence
Plain radiographyNoneNo role in diagnosis of acute appendicitis,w6although in some cases a faecolith may be shown
UltrasonographyAperistaltic and non-compressible structure with diameter >6 mmw8Sensitivity of 86%; specificity of 81%
Computed tomography scanningAbnormal appendix identified or calcified appendicolith seen in association with periappendiceal inflammation or diameter >6 mmw8Sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 95% in diagnosis of acute appendicitis
Magnetic resonance imagingNot confirmedRestricted to cases in which radiation and diagnostic difficulties preclude use of other modalities (for example, pregnancy)

Ultrasound (US)

Use of ultrasound is increasing, particularly in children in whom the risks of ionizing radiation are greatest. The advantages include decreased cost relative to other imaging modalities and lack of ionizing radiation exposure. However, it is operator-dependent.

The visualization of a thickened, non-compressible appendix greater than 6 mm in diameter is diagnostic. If the US is non-diagnostic, further imaging with CT or MRI, particularly in pregnancy, is required. In practice, a positive ultrasound can be used to reduce CT scan utilization. However, a negative or non-diagnostic result is not sufficient to rule out appendicitis. During childbearing age, it can be helpful to exclude a tubo-ovarian abscess.

CT Scan

CT of the abdomen and pelvis is considered the modality of choice for definitive assessment of patients being evaluated for possible appendicitis. However, a major concern with CT scan is radiation exposure, particularly in children. Practitioners should, therefore, use these scans judiciously. Limited-range CT scans have been proposed in children to reduce the radiation dose. The following findings may be seen:

If the practitioner does not visualize the appendix, appendicitis is not ruled out.

MRI

MRI is a reliable modality which is particularly useful for pregnant women and children when ultrasound is inconclusive. Since intravenous (IV) gadolinium can cross the placenta, it should not be used during pregnancy. Also, patients with renal insufficiency should not receive IV gadolinium.

The following factors limit MRI use:

Also, MRI is not a test of choice for unstable patients and young children in whom sedation may be required. In recent years, the utility of rapid MRI without contrast agents or sedation has been assessed for a diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis.

Treatment of Appendicitis

If practitioners are evaluating the patient for appendicitis, they should also obtain an early surgical consultation.Intravenously administer isotonic crystalloid fluid.

In perforated appendicitis consider the following choices:

Surgery of Appendicitis

Health care professionals call the surgery to remove the appendix an appendectomy. A surgeon performs the surgery using one of the following methods:

Surgery versus antibiotics

We found three systematic reviews (each with a search date of 2011). The three reviews reported many of the same RCTs, but in different combinations (see Further information on studies). Each review reported a synthesis of different outcome measures and came to different conclusions; therefore, we have reported all three reviews here to cover the full spectrum of evidence.

Treatment success

Surgery compared with antibiotics Appendicectomy may be more effective than antibiotics at reducing treatment failure including recurrence at up to 1 year, but may be less effective at reducing some complications in adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, the evidence is weak and results varied by outcome measured (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type)PopulationOutcome, InterventionsResults and statistical analysisEffect sizeFavours
Treatment success
Systematic reviewAdults with acute uncomplicated appendicitis (no abscess or phlegmon)
5 RCTs in this analysis
Initial treatment failure (antibiotic: failure to achieve definite improvement without the need for surgery and hospital discharge without an operation; appendicectomy: failure to achieve pathologically confirmed appendicitis after surgery or another surgical indication for operation)
40/470 (9%) with appendicectomy
137/510 (27%) with antibiotics
OR 2.43
95% CI 0.94 to 6.33
P = 0.07
Significant heterogeneity: I² = 69%, P = 0.01
Heterogeneity not further explained
Not significant
Systematic reviewAdults with suspected acute uncomplicated appendicitis (no abscess or phlegmon)
5 RCTs in this analysis
Overall treatment failure (initial treatment failure plus anyone in the antibiotic group requiring appendicectomy because of recurrence) up to 1 year
40/470 (9%) with appendicectomy
205/510 (40%) with antibiotics
OR 6.72
95% CI 3.48 to 12.99
P <0.00001
Moderate effect sizeappendicectomy
Systematic reviewAdults with acute uncomplicated appendicitis (no abscess or phlegmon)
5 RCTs in this analysis
Overall complications (e.g., surgical site infection, organ space infection, small bowel obstruction, other)
60/510 (12%) with antibiotics
83/470 (18%) with appendicectomy
OR 0.54
95% CI 0.37 to 0.78
P = 0.001
Small effect sizeantibiotics
Systematic reviewMainly adults, mean age 28.2 years (range 13–75 years), suspected acute appendicitis based on disease history, clinical status, and laboratory findings
5 RCTs in this analysis
Mean cure (within 2 weeks [free of symptoms such as abdominal pain, fever, inflammatory parameters] and without major complication [including recurrence] within 1 year)
97% with appendicectomy
73% with antibiotics
Absolute numbers not reported
The review pooled data for each group and calculated 95% CI
Appendicectomy: 97% (95% CI 94% to 99%)
Antibiotics: 73% (95% CI 63% to 82%)
Mean cure rates were higher with appendicectomy, but the review did not report a between-group P value
Systematic reviewMainly adults, mean age 28.2 years (range 13–75 years), suspected acute appendicitis based on disease history, clinical status, and laboratory findings
5 RCTs in this analysis
No major complications (including the need for further [invasive] treatment or prolonged admission [e.g., abscesses, ileus, deep wound infection, recurrence, re-operation, secondary perforation])
97% with appendicectomy
83% with antibiotics
Absolute numbers not reported
The review pooled data for each group and calculated 95% CI
Appendicectomy: 97% (95% CI 93% to 99%)
Antibiotics: 83% (95% CI 72% to 91%)
Proportion of people with no major complications was higher with appendicectomy, but the review did not report a between-group P value
Systematic reviewMainly adults, mean age 28.2 years (range 13–75 years), suspected acute appendicitis based on disease history, clinical status, and laboratory findings
5 RCTs in this analysis
No minor complications (e.g., superficial wound infections, negative appendix at histology [no appendicitis], diarrhoea, urinary tract infection)
91% with appendicectomy
96% with antibiotics
Absolute numbers not reported
The review pooled data for each group and calculated 95% CI
Appendicectomy: 91% (95% CI 83% to 96%)
Antibiotics: 96% (95% CI 93% to 97%)
Proportion of people with no minor complications was higher with antibiotics, but the review did not report a between-group P value
Systematic reviewAdults with a diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitisComplications (antibiotics: perforated or gangrenous appendix, peritonitis, or wound infection [in people who failed antibiotics and had appendicectomy subsequently]; appendicectomy: perforated appendicitis, peritonitis, or wound infection)
84/470 (18%) with antibiotics
108/430 (25%) with appendicectomy
RR 0.69
95% CI 0.54 to 0.89
P = 0.004
Small effect sizeantibiotics
Systematic reviewAdults with a diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitisRisk of complicated appendiciti
54/470 (11%) with antibiotics
131/430 (31%) with appendicectomy
RR 0.46
95% CI 0.19 to 1.12
P = 0.09
Significant heterogeneity: I² = 82%, P <0.001
A sensitivity analysis removing 1 RCT with high crossover found a similar result, but there was still significant heterogeneity among groups (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.90; I² = 74%)
Not significant

Mortality (from appendicitis)

Surgery compared with antibiotics We don’t know whether appendicectomy and antibiotics differ in effectiveness at reducing mortality from appendicitis in adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type)PopulationOutcome, InterventionsResults and statistical analysisEffect sizeFavours
Mortality
Systematic reviewAdults with acute uncomplicated appendicitis(no abscess or phlegmonrx)
5 RCTs in this analysis
Mortality 
with antibiotics
with appendicectomy

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Length of hospital stay

Surgery compared with antibiotics We don’t know whether appendicectomy and antibiotics differ in effectiveness at reducing length of hospital stay in adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis (rx).

Ref (type)PopulationOutcome, InterventionsResults and statistical analysisEffect sizeFavours
Length of hospital stay
Systematic reviewMainly adults, mean age 28.2 years (range 13–75 years), suspected acute appendicitis based on disease history, clinical status, and laboratory findings
4 RCTs in this analysis
Duration of hospital stay days 
with antibiotics
with appendicectomy
Mean difference 0.66 days
95% CI 0.44 days to 0.87 days
P <0.0001
1 RCT in the review was not included in the analysis; the review reported this was based on visual inspection, but did not report any further reason for its exclusion
Effect size not calculatedappendicectomy
Systematic reviewAdults with a diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitisLength of primary hospital stay, days (antibiotics: days of admission for people treated with antibiotics and discharged with antibiotics; appendicectomy: days of admission for people treated with appendicectomy and discharged with further follow-up)
with antibiotics
with appendicectomy
Mean difference +0.20 days
95% CI –0.16 days to +0.87 days
P = 0.29
Not significant
Systematic reviewAdults with acute uncomplicated appendicitis[rx] (no abscess or phlegmon)
5 RCTs in this analysis
Length of hospital stay days 
with antibiotics
with appendicectomy
Mean difference +0.34 days
95% CI –0.06 days to +0.73 days
P = 0.09
Not significant

Return to normal activities

Surgery compared with antibiotics Antibiotics may be more effective than appendicectomy at reducing the duration of sick leave or disability in adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, results vary based on the analysis performed (rx).

Ref (type)PopulationOutcome, InterventionsResults and statistical analysisEffect sizeFavours
Sick leave days
Systematic reviewMainly adults, mean age 28.2 years (range 13–75 years), suspected acute appendicitis based on disease history, clinical status, and laboratory findings
2 RCTs in this analysis
Duration of sick leave days 
with antibiotics
with appendicectomy
Mean difference –0.69 days
95% CI –1.65 days to +0.27 days
Not significant
Systematic reviewAdults with acute uncomplicated appendicitis[rx] (no abscess or phlegmon)
3 RCTs in this analysis
Duration of sick leave or disability 
with antibiotics
with appendicectomy
Standard mean difference –0.19
95% CI –0.06 to –0.33
P = 0.005
Effect size not calculatedantibiotics

Quality of life

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Adverse effects

Ref (type)PopulationOutcome, InterventionsResults and statistical analysisEffect sizeFavours
Adverse effects
Systematic reviewMainly adults, mean age 28.2 years (range 13–75 years), suspected acute appendicitis based on disease history, clinical status, and laboratory findingsAdverse effects 
with antibiotics
with appendicectomy
Systematic reviewAdults with a diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitisRe-admissions with recurrence of symptoms 
with antibiotics
with appendicectomy
Significance not reported
Systematic reviewAdults with acute uncomplicated appendicitis (no abscess or phlegmon)
5 RCTs in this analysis
Recurrence of symptoms 
with antibiotics
with appendicectomy

References

Appendicitis Early Signs Symptoms,

Exit mobile version