There are four main ways to deliver an error in Node.js:
- throw the error (making it an exception).
- pass the error to a callback, a function provided specifically for handling errors and the results of asynchronous operations
- pass the error to a reject Promise function
- emit an “error” event on an EventEmitter
Finally, you should know that in JavaScript (and Node.js especially), there’s a difference between an error and an exception. An error is any instance of the Error class. Errors may be constructed and then passed directly to another function or thrown. When you throw an error, it becomes an exception.2 Here’s an example of using an error as an exception:
throw new Error('something bad happened')
but you can just as well create an Error without throwing it:
callback(new Error('something bad happened'))
And this is much more common in Node.js because most errors are asynchronous.
Throw, Callback, Reject, or EventEmitter?
There are three basic patterns for a function to deliver errors.
1> throw delivers an error synchronously — that is, in the same context where the function was called. If the caller (or the caller’s caller, …) used try/catch, then they can catch the error. If none of the callers did, the program usually crashes. (The error can also be handled by domains or the process-wide “uncaughtException” event, which are discussed below.)
2> Callbacks are the most basic way of delivering an error asynchronously. The user passes you a function (the callback), and you invoke it sometime later when the asynchronous operation completes. The usual pattern is that the callback is invoked as callback(err, result), where only one of err and result is non-null, depending on whether the operation succeeded or failed. Promise rejections are a common way to deliver an error asynchrously. This method is growing in popularity since the release of Node.js version 8 that includes support for async/await. This allows asynchrounous code to be written to look like synchronous code and to catch errors using try/catch.
3> For more complicated cases, instead of using a callback, the function itself can return an EventEmitter object, and the caller would be expected to listen for error events on the emitter. This is useful in two particular cases: When you’re doing a complicated operation that may produce multiple errors or multiple results. For example, think about a request that fetches rows from a database and then streams the rows back as they arrive, rather than waiting for them all to arrive first. In this case, instead of taking a callback, your function would return an EventEmitter and emit row events for each result, an end event when all results have been reported, and an error event if any error is encountered. For objects that represent complex state machines, where a lot of different asynchronous things can happen. For example, a socket is an event emitter that may emit “connect”, “end”, “timeout”, “drain”, and “close”. It’s natural to make “error” just another type of event that the socket can emit. When using this approach, it’s important to be clear about when “error” is emitted, whether any other events may be emitted, what other events may be seen at the same time (e.g., “close”), what order they happen in, and whether the socket is closed at the end of it.
By far, the most common case is an operational error in an asynchronous function. For the majority of these, you’ll want to have your function take a callback as an argument, and you’ll just pass the error to the callback. This works very well, and is widely used. See the Node fs module for examples. If you’ve got a more complicated case like the ones described above, you may want to use an event emitter instead, but you’ll still deliver the error asynchronously.
There are 2 ways to report an error in middleware to Express. The first, as you saw above, is to throw an exception in the same tick. Because of the async nature of JavaScript, this isn’t very useful. If you throw an error asynchronously, you’ll just crash the server.
Errors that occur in synchronous code inside route handlers and middleware require no extra work. If synchronous code throws an error, then Express will catch and process it. For example:
app.get("/", function(req, res) {
throw new Error("BROKEN"); // Express will catch this on its own.
});For errors returned from asynchronous functions invoked by route handlers and middleware, you must pass them to the next() function, where Express will catch and process them. For example:
app.get("/", function(req, res, next) {
fs.readFile("/file-does-not-exist", function(err, data) {
if (err) {
next(err); // Pass errors to Express.
} else {
res.send(data);
}
});
});If you pass anything to the next() function (except the string ‘route’), Express regards the current request as being an error and will skip any remaining non-error handling routing and middleware functions.
throw error vs next(error)
throw error is brute-force ugly way to do error handling in ExpressJS apps. Basically, just throw the exception after it bubbles back up to the route handler.
app.get("/users", function(req, res) {
User.find(function(err, users) {
// an error?! let's crash the app!
if (err) {
throw err;
}
// no error? ok, fine. do normal stuff here
// res.render... etc.
});
});This works. If you don’t mind the app completely blowing chunks at this point and dumping itself entirely.
But Unhandled exceptions should not be allowed to crash and exit the app.
Therefore, you really want to handle this exception in your callback, properly.
app.get("/users", function(req, res, next) {
User.find(function(err, users) {
// an error? get it out of here!
if (err) {
return next(err);
}
// no error? good. I'll do normal stuff here
// res.render... etc.
});
});The third parameter next calling which (next()) will switch the execution flow to the next handler.
It’s a simple change, but using return next(err) instead of throw err allows asynchronous code to raise an exception and still have it caught by the error handling pipeline in your app. Instead of putting the app into an unknown state where everything is potential dead or dangerous, calling next(err) tells the Express and Connect frameworks to pass the error along until an error handling middleware of function can properly take care of it.
When to use next() and when to use return next() and some important difference?
Most people always write return next() is to ensure that the execution stops after triggering the callback.
If you don’t do it, you risk triggering the callback a second time later, which usually has devastating results.
An example of not using return here if you write middleware like this:
app.use((req, res, next) => {
console.log("This is a middleware");
next();
console.log("This is first-half middleware");
});
app.use((req, res, next) => {
console.log("This is second middleware");
next();
});
app.use((req, res, next) => {
console.log("This is third middleware");
next();
});You will find out that the output in console is:
This is a middleware
This is second middleware
This is third middleware
This is first-half middleware
That is, it runs the code below next() after all middleware function finished.
However, if you use return next(), it will jump out the callback immediately and the code below return next() in the callback will be unreachable.
Further Reading
1> https://www.joyent.com/node-js/production/design/errors – This is very detailed and exhaustive coverage of the concept of errors in Node/Express
