Kumar–Levick syndrome is an old eponym used in the limb-malformation literature for a family in which several members had striking nail underdevelopment or absence (onychodystrophy/anonychia) together with abnormal development of the ends of the fingers and toes (distal phalanges) and hand malformations like camptodactyly (permanently bent fingers) or split-hand/ectrodactyly in some reports. In historical summaries, mild intellectual disability and occasional deafness were mentioned; however, modern reclassification puts most such families under Cooks syndrome (also called anonychia-onychodystrophy with hypoplasia or absence of distal phalanges), which typically does not include extra-skeletal anomalies. In other words, “Kumar–Levick syndrome” is best read today as a legacy label that overlaps with (or was folded into) Cooks syndrome. PMC+3mhmedical.com+3Orpha+3

Kumar–Levick syndrome is a very rare, inherited condition where some finger and toe bones at the tips are missing or under-developed, and nails can be small, misshapen, or absent. Doctors also see changes like a short fifth finger, thumbs that look “digitized” (longer or broader), and in some families split-hand/foot patterns (ectrodactyly). The condition is usually autosomal dominant (it can pass from an affected parent to a child). It was first described in an English family by Kumar and Levick in the 1980s, and the same clinical picture is cataloged today under names such as “anonychia-onychodystrophy with brachydactyly type B and ectrodactyly,” and is sometimes discussed near or alongside Cook’s syndrome in classification systems. PMC+3PubMed+3Genetic Diseases Center+3

During early fetal life, genes instruct the hands and feet to form bones and nails. In related conditions like brachydactyly type B, mistakes in limb-patterning signals (for example genes in the ROR2 pathway) can disturb growth in the ends of the fingers and toes; Kumar–Levick syndrome shows a similar pattern of missing distal phalanges and nail problems, but exact gene changes are not firmly established for all families. The end result is a stable, lifelong anatomy difference—not an inflammatory disease or infection—so medicines cannot “regrow” bones, but therapy and surgery can improve function and comfort.

Other names

Because the naming evolved, you may see:

  • Cooks syndrome (current, preferred umbrella term for this nail–distal phalanx pattern). Wikipedia

  • Anonychia–onychodystrophy with hypoplasia/absence of distal phalanges (descriptive term often used in genetics handbooks). Wikipedia

  • Anonychia–onychodystrophy with brachydactyly type B and ectrodactyly (a very rare presentation originally reported in a multigeneration English family). Some authors debated whether this equaled Cooks syndrome; more recent work keeps them distinct entities. Wikipedia

  • “Kumar–Levick” family (historic pedigree description that helped seed the eponym). PMC

Important context: Orphanet explicitly removed “Kumar–Levick syndrome” as a separate entry and points readers to Cooks syndrome. Orpha+1

Types

Doctors don’t formally subtype “Kumar–Levick syndrome” today; instead they consider a phenotypic spectrum within or alongside Cooks syndrome. In practice, you’ll hear clinicians describe:

  1. Classic Cooks-pattern: nail hypoplasia on the thumbs–middle fingers, nail absence on ring/little fingers; all toenails absent; distal phalanges underdeveloped/absent; thumbs may look lengthened/bulbous. Intelligence and hearing usually normal. Wikipedia

  2. Cooks-pattern with camptodactyly: same nail/phalangeal pattern plus permanent finger flexion; function varies. (Historic “Kumar–Levick” notes mentioned camptodactyly.) mhmedical.com

  3. Overlap phenotype with brachydactyly type B: shortened/absent terminal phalanges and nails, sometimes confused with Cooks in older papers; more recent clinical–radiographic work separates them. Wikipedia

  4. Cooks-pattern with ectrodactyly (split hand/foot): very rare; largely historical; modern nosology tends to code split hand/foot separately unless family genetics link them. Wikipedia

  5. Historic “extra-skeletal” reports: mild intellectual disability or deafness were cited in older summaries; today, most Cooks cases lack these features, and if present, clinicians re-examine for another diagnosis. mhmedical.com+1

Causes

Although the name is historical, modern genetics has clarified mechanisms driving the Cooks-pattern that captures most “Kumar–Levick” cases:

  1. Noncoding duplications at 17q24.3 (upstream of SOX9) that disturb normal gene-regulatory architecture during limb development. Think of this as “extra copies” of control DNA that mis-tune nearby genes. PMC+1

  2. Creation of a “neo-TAD” (new chromatin domain) by those duplications, which changes long-range DNA looping and misregulates limb genes (notably KCNJ2). PubMed+1

  3. Upstream enhancer effects on SOX9, a master regulator of cartilage/bone formation in the limbs. Enhancers are “dimmer switches” for genes; duplicating them can brighten the wrong circuits at the wrong time. PMC

  4. KCNJ2 regulatory involvement within the 17q24.3 rearrangements—evidence suggests the rearrangement spans KCNJ2/KCNJ16 regions and SOX9 regulatory DNA. ClinGen

  5. In-tandem microduplications across the SOX9–KCNJ2 interval identified in several families with the Cooks phenotype. PubMed

  6. Autosomal dominant inheritance in classic pedigrees—one altered copy can cause the phenotype; penetrance can vary. Wikipedia

  7. De novo (new) duplications—a child may be the first case in a family due to a spontaneous event in early development. (General mechanism for structural variants implicated in Cooks.) PMC

  8. Size/placement differences in the duplication—slightly different duplicated blocks can shift which enhancers are hijacked, shaping severity. PMC

  9. Topologically associating domain (TAD) boundary disruption—moving boundaries alters which genes “hear” which enhancers. ScienceDirect

  10. Allelic heterogeneity in noncoding elements—not the gene’s code, but the surrounding control DNA differs among families. PMC

  11. Mosaicism—if the duplication occurs after the first cell divisions, only some tissues carry it, potentially softening or asymmetrically distributing the features. (General SV principle applied to this locus.) ScienceDirect

  12. Modifier genes—background variants elsewhere can amplify or dampen the phenotype even with the same 17q24.3 change. (Inference from limb-enhancer biology.) Annual Reviews

  13. Epigenetic context—chromatin state (how DNA is packed) affects enhancer reach; duplications interact with that state. PMC

  14. Position effects—the problem is “where” the DNA chunk sits, not damage to SOX9’s coding sequence itself. PMC

  15. Noncoding rearrangement complexity—some families have complex rearrangements (not a clean copy-paste), with multiple breakpoints. MDC Repository

  16. Species-conserved enhancers miswired—the limb enhancers affected are deeply conserved; duplicating them has outsized effects during development. PMC

  17. Variable expressivity—same duplication, different appearance between relatives, a hallmark of many autosomal-dominant limb malformations. Wikipedia

  18. Distinction from RSPO4-related isolated anonychia—if nails are the only finding, RSPO4 mutations cause recessive anonychia and are a different disease mechanism. MedlinePlus

  19. Differentiation from brachydactyly type B—clinically similar but genetically distinct in many families; careful imaging and genetics separate them. Wikipedia

  20. Historic mis-labeling—older eponyms (e.g., “Kumar–Levick”) lumped different syndromes; modern molecular testing clarifies true cause for each family. Orpha

Symptoms and clinical features

  1. Nail hypoplasia (thin/small nails) on thumbs–middle fingers—usually present from birth. Wikipedia

  2. Anonychia (absent nails) especially on ring and little fingers, and all toenails often missing. Wikipedia

  3. Underdeveloped or absent distal phalanges—the very tips of fingers/toes may be shortened or missing on X-ray. Wikipedia

  4. Thumb “digitalization”/lengthening—thumbs may look longer or more finger-like. Wikipedia

  5. Bulbous finger tips in some individuals. Wikipedia

  6. Camptodactyly—one or more fingers fixed in a bent position (historic descriptions). mhmedical.com

  7. Ectrodactyly (split hand/foot)—rare/historic overlap reports. Wikipedia

  8. Hand function differences—fine pinch, buttoning, or writing can be tricky; many adapt well with practice. (Functional inference for distal-tip absence.)

  9. Footwear challenges—missing toenails and shortened toe tips may cause pressure points; wide toe-box shoes can help. (Clinical management logic.)

  10. Normal hair/teeth/eyes—Cooks syndrome by itself usually spares other ectodermal tissues. Wikipedia

  11. Normal growth and intellect in most modern Cooks-pattern reports. Wikipedia

  12. Historic mentions of mild intellectual disability—seen in early “Kumar–Levick” summaries but not typical in current Cooks series; re-evaluate if present. mhmedical.com

  13. Historic mentions of occasional deafness—again, not typical today; audiology is reasonable if there are concerns. mhmedical.com

  14. Asymmetry—one hand/foot may be more affected, reflecting developmental variability. PMC

  15. Family clustering—multiple affected across generations fits autosomal-dominant transmission. Wikipedia

Diagnostic tests

A) Physical examination (bedside)

  1. Detailed hand–foot inspection: document which nails are thin/absent and which digits have shortened tips; photograph for the record. Pattern recognition drives the diagnosis. Wikipedia

  2. Range-of-motion assessment: look for camptodactyly and joint stiffness to guide therapy.

  3. Grip/pinch strength testing: simple dynamometer or clinical maneuvers to gauge function and plan occupational therapy.

  4. Skin/hair/teeth survey: helps separate Cooks-pattern from broader ectodermal dysplasias (usually normal in Cooks). Wikipedia

  5. Ear and craniofacial check: only if concerns—historic notes mentioned deafness, but this is atypical; still, a quick look is prudent. mhmedical.com

B) “Manual”/functional tests

  1. Nine-Hole Peg Test or Purdue Pegboard: measures fine motor speed/coordination for baseline and therapy goals.

  2. Activities of daily living (ADL) assessment: buttoning, handwriting, typing; informs accommodations.

  3. Footwear/pressure mapping (in clinic): simple in-shoe pressure tests to prevent callus formation over altered toe tips.

C) Lab & pathological (used mainly to rule out look-alikes; Cooks-pattern itself doesn’t require blood tests)

  1. No specific blood marker exists; labs are usually normal. The point is to avoid unnecessary tests unless differential diagnoses suggest them. (Practice principle.)

  2. Occasional nail biopsy only if a secondary acquired nail disease is suspected; typically not needed in congenital patterns. (Dermatology practice principle.)

D) Electrodiagnostic

  1. Otoacoustic emissions (OAE): quick newborn/child hearing screen if there’s a concern. Historic notes of deafness warrant checking but it’s not routine if hearing is clearly normal. mhmedical.com

  2. Auditory brainstem response (ABR): electrophysiologic hearing test if behavioral audiometry isn’t possible or is inconclusive. (Standard audiology pathway.)

E) Imaging

  1. Hand X-rays: confirm absent/under-ossified distal phalanges; proximal bones are typically normal in Cooks syndrome. Wikipedia

  2. Foot X-rays: document toe phalangeal pattern; helps with orthotics planning. Wikipedia

  3. Targeted ultrasound or MRI (rare): only for surgical planning in unusual cases or to evaluate soft-tissue constraints in camptodactyly. (Orthopedic practice principle.)

  4. Prenatal ultrasound (when there’s a known familial variant): sometimes detects digital anomalies in late second trimester; sensitivity is variable. (General prenatal imaging principle.)

F) Genetics (cornerstone of modern diagnosis)

  1. Chromosomal microarray (CMA): screens for 17q24.3 microduplication and other copy-number variants. It’s a first-line tool for suspected structural causes. PMC

  2. Targeted CNV analysis at 17q24.3 (qPCR/MLPA or clinical CNV panels): higher-resolution confirmation of SOX9–KCNJ2 regulatory region duplications. ClinGen

  3. Exome or genome sequencing with structural variant calling: captures complex rearrangements or clarifies overlaps (e.g., to distinguish from brachydactyly type B or RSPO4-related isolated anonychia). MDC Repository+1

  4. Segregation testing in relatives: checks whether the variant tracks with the phenotype, supporting autosomal-dominant inheritance and aiding family planning.

Management overview

There is no drug that reverses the bone pattern. Care aims to: (1) protect skin/nails, (2) prevent and treat infections around nail folds when they occur, (3) maximize function with occupational/hand therapy, splints, and adaptive tools, and (4) consider reconstructive surgery in select cases to improve pinch, grasp, shoe-wear, and cosmesis. Many children do very well with therapy alone. OrthoInfo+2Musculoskeletal Key+2


Non-pharmacological treatments (therapies & others)

Note: These are menu options; clinicians individualize plans based on the child’s anatomy and goals.

  1. Occupational (hand) therapy. Trains grip strategies, handwriting aids, fine-motor skills, and independence in daily tasks; often the mainstay of care in congenital hand differences. OrthoInfo+1

  2. Physical therapy. Keeps joints supple, strengthens forearm/hand muscles, and protects posture and shoulder mechanics when hand function is different. OrthoInfo

  3. Custom splints/orthoses. Night or activity splints support alignment, protect sensitive tips, and aid prehension during growth spurts. Musculoskeletal Key

  4. Adaptive equipment. Pencil grips, button hooks, jar openers, keyboard mods, and sports adaptations improve speed and ease without surgery. OrthoInfo

  5. Skin and periungual care routine. Gentle cleansing, emollients, and protective gloves reduce hangnails and skin breaks that invite infection when nails are small/absent. Oncology Nursing Society

  6. Footwear modification & inserts. Wider toe boxes and custom insoles improve comfort and balance when toes are missing/short. Journal of the Foot & Ankle

  7. Activity coaching/therapeutic recreation. Structured play and sports build confidence, dexterity, and social participation. OrthoInfo

  8. School accommodations. Extra time for handwriting, access to laptops or speech-to-text, and tailored physical education plans support learning. OrthoInfo

  9. Prosthetic consultation (when useful). For specific tasks, partial-hand or activity-specific devices can augment grip or tool use. OccupationalTherapy.com

  10. Paronychia prevention education. Trim hangnails smoothly, avoid biting/picking, keep areas dry; early warm soaks if tender. Medscape

  11. Family counseling. Early reassurance that etiology isn’t anyone’s “fault” lowers parental guilt and improves adherence to therapy plans. OccupationalTherapy.com

  12. Peer support & body-image coaching. Coping strategies and peer groups reduce stigma; kids frequently thrive with visible differences. PMC

  13. Ergonomic training. Task-specific body mechanics prevent overuse of unaffected joints and reduce fatigue. OrthoInfo

  14. Protective padding/gel caps. Reduces pressure and shear at sensitive tips during sports or long writing sessions. OrthoInfo

  15. Callus and nail-plate care when present. Regular, careful trimming to comfort (not too short) reduces fissures and secondary infections. Pachyonychia Congenita Project

  16. Tele-rehab check-ins. Periodic remote reviews keep home programs on track between in-person visits. Musculoskeletal Key

  17. Genetic counseling for family planning. Explains autosomal-dominant inheritance and options for prenatal counseling. Genetic Diseases Center

  18. Occupational performance goals (goal-directed plans). Agreeing on realistic, time-bound goals improves outcomes and family satisfaction. ResearchGate

  19. Desensitization and sensory play. Helps children get comfortable using sensitive tips and improves tactile discrimination. OrthoInfo

  20. Multidisciplinary review boards. Regular surgeon-therapist-family meetings adjust plans as the child grows. Musculoskeletal Key


Drug treatments

There is no medicine that regrows missing bones or nails in this condition. Drugs are used only when needed for symptoms or complications (e.g., skin infections near nail folds) and should be prescribed by a clinician for a specific reason. Below are common, supportive medication categories—not a fixed “protocol”—with brief purpose notes and safety caveats.

  • Topical emollients/barrier creams (e.g., petrolatum, urea creams): soften dry periungual skin, reduce fissures that invite infection. Avoid use on open wounds unless instructed. Oncology Nursing Society

  • Topical antiseptics (chlorhexidine, dilute bleach/vinegar soaks as directed by clinicians): sometimes used to lower bacterial/yeast load in recurrent paronychia; must be diluted correctly. Oncology Nursing Society

  • Warm-soak care + topical antibiotics for acute paronychia (if bacterial): mupirocin/fusidic acid as locally recommended; escalate to oral antibiotics if cellulitis. Follow a clinician’s plan. Medscape

  • Antifungals for confirmed onychomycosis/paronychia: only if lab-confirmed and symptomatic; options (topical/oral) depend on organism and age. Primary Care Dermatology Society

  • Analgesics (acetaminophen; NSAIDs if appropriate): short courses for post-procedure pain; avoid long-term use without medical supervision. OrthoInfo

  • Local anesthetics (clinic use) for minor procedures (adhesion trimming, nail fold care). Medscape

  • Antibiotics (oral): short courses only when a clinician diagnoses bacterial infection (e.g., spreading redness, pus, fever). Not for routine prevention. Medscape

  • Antipruritics/anti-inflammatories (short topical steroid course) around irritated periungual skin if dermatitis is diagnosed; supervised by clinician. Primary Care Dermatology Society

  • Tetanus up-to-date: routine immunization matters with any skin breaks. (General pediatric practice.) OrthoInfo

  • Peri-operative medications (antibiotic prophylaxis, analgesia) are tailored to the surgery and child’s weight. PMC

(Given your request for “20 drugs,” I’m intentionally limiting the list to clinically defensible, supportive categories. Any longer list would risk implying disease-modifying effects that don’t exist for this genetic anatomy difference.)


Dietary molecular supplements

There is no supplement proven to change bone formation or nail absence in this syndrome. Nutrition supports general growth, bone health, skin integrity, and wound healing around procedures. Discuss any supplement with your clinician, especially for children.

  1. Protein-adequate diet / amino acids – supports tissue repair and post-op healing. OrthoInfo

  2. Vitamin D – supports bone health broadly; supplement only if deficient per tests. OrthoInfo

  3. Calcium – dietary sources preferred; supplements only if dietary intake is low. OrthoInfo

  4. Omega-3 fatty acids – general anti-inflammatory dietary support; not disease-modifying here. OrthoInfo

  5. Zinc – involved in wound repair; supplement if low or during wound-care episodes per clinician. OrthoInfo

  6. Vitamin C – collagen synthesis and wound healing support around surgeries. OrthoInfo

  7. B-complex – general energy metabolism; no disease-specific effect, consider only if dietary insufficiency. OrthoInfo

  8. Biotin – may improve brittle nails in other contexts; no evidence to create nails where the matrix is absent. Primary Care Dermatology Society

  9. Iron (if deficient) – corrects anemia that could slow healing; test-guided only. OrthoInfo

  10. Arginine-rich foods – sometimes used around wound care; diet-first approach is preferred in children. OrthoInfo


Immunity boosters, regenerative or stem-cell drugs

There are no approved regenerative or stem-cell drugs for Kumar–Levick syndrome, and no credible evidence that “immune boosters” change its anatomy. Using such products outside clinical trials could be risky and unethical. If you see claims online, ask for peer-reviewed proof and regulatory approvals—none exist for this indication. Focus resources on proven rehab and, when indicated, reconstructive surgery. Genetic Diseases Center+1


Surgeries

  1. Cleft-hand reconstruction (ectrodactyly correction). Uses local flaps, tendon balancing, and deepening of the central cleft to improve pinch and grasp; aims for function and appearance. Outcomes in small series report good parent/patient satisfaction. PMC

  2. Cleft-foot reconstruction. Closure/deepening techniques (e.g., flap-bag methods) to narrow forefoot and permit standard shoes; goals are comfort and shoe-wear more than speed. ScienceDirect+1

  3. Ray transposition or partial ray resection. Re-positions or removes poorly functional rays to improve alignment and pinch span. PMC

  4. Soft-tissue balancing and tendon transfers. Improves stability and coordinated motion when bony architecture is atypical. PMC

  5. Osteotomies/bone grafting (select cases). For severe deformities or midfoot/forefoot instability, planned cuts and grafts can improve alignment. ScienceDirect

Timing is individualized; many centers operate in early childhood if function is limited, while others defer if the child is doing well with therapy alone. University of Michigan Health


Prevention

  1. Genetic counseling for families (understand inheritance, discuss options). Genetic Diseases Center

  2. Routine skin/nail-fold care to prevent infections. Oncology Nursing Society

  3. Protective gloves for chores/chemicals. iCliniq

  4. Avoid nail biting/picking. PMC

  5. Trim nails (if present) straight—not too short. Medscape

  6. Choose wide, well-fitted shoes to reduce pressure if toes are affected. Journal of the Foot & Ankle

  7. Keep up with vaccines (tetanus protection matters with skin breaks). OrthoInfo

  8. Build hand/foot strength with guided play. OrthoInfo

  9. Early therapy enrollment—habits formed young bring better long-term function. Musculoskeletal Key

  10. Regular team reviews as the child grows to adjust splints, goals, and school supports. Musculoskeletal Key


When to see a doctor (red flags)

  • New redness, swelling, warmth, or pus near nail folds (possible infection). Medscape

  • Pain that limits use or sudden change in function/shape after injury. OrthoInfo

  • Problems with shoes, skin breakdown, or pressure sores on the feet. Journal of the Foot & Ankle

  • School or daily-living tasks getting harder—time to refresh therapy goals or assistive tools. OrthoInfo

  • Family planning questions (inheritance, prenatal options). Genetic Diseases Center


What to eat / what to avoid

Eat more of:

  1. Protein-rich foods (repair, growth).

  2. Fruit/veg for vitamins C, K, antioxidants.

  3. Dairy/fortified alternatives for calcium and vitamin D.

  4. Whole grains (energy for therapy)

  5. 5) Omega-3 sources (fish, flax) for general anti-inflammatory support. OrthoInfo

Limit/avoid:

  1. Smoking exposure (impairs wound healing).
  2. Excess sugary drinks (empty calories).
  3. Ultra-processed foods high in salt/fats (inflammation/weight gain).
  4. Crash diets (poor healing).
  5. Unregulated “stem-cell” or “bone-regrowth” supplements sold online—no proof for this condition. OrthoInfo

FAQs

1) Is Kumar–Levick syndrome the same as Cook’s syndrome?
They are closely related in how they look (nail absence and missing end bones). Some catalogs merged/realigned entries over time; “Kumar–Levick” is kept as an alias for the descriptive entity “anonychia-onychodystrophy with brachydactyly type B and ectrodactyly.” Orpha+1

2) What causes it?
It’s genetic. Limb-patterning signals in early development don’t fully form the end bones and nail units. Related conditions involve the ROR2 pathway; exact mutations for all K–L families aren’t pinned down. Cell

3) Can medicines or vitamins regrow bones or nails?
No. Medicines help with symptoms (like infections) or surgical comfort, but they don’t rebuild missing bones or nail matrices. Medscape

4) Do children function well?
Most adapt remarkably. With therapy, splints, and sometimes surgery, kids can write, play sports, and live independently. OrthoInfo

5) When is surgery considered?
When function is limited, shoe-wear is difficult, or appearance causes distress despite therapy; techniques for cleft hand/foot show good satisfaction in small studies. PMC+1

6) Is it painful?
The anatomy difference itself isn’t an ongoing pain disorder, but skin around reduced nails can get irritated or infected—treatable with local care and, when needed, short courses of medicines. Medscape

7) How is it diagnosed?
Clinical exam, family history, and X-rays. Genetic counseling is advised. Genetic Diseases Center

8) Is it progressive?
The bone pattern is present from birth and does not “spread.” Needs change as children grow, so therapy plans evolve. OrthoInfo

9) Are there research trials?
None for drug reversal of the condition. Focus remains on rehab and reconstruction. (Rare-disease registries list the entity, but no disease-modifying therapy is available.) malacards.org

10) Can nail fungus be treated if it occurs?
Yes—only if lab-confirmed and symptomatic—using antifungals as directed. Not all nail changes here are infections. Primary Care Dermatology Society

11) Will my child need lifelong therapy?
Therapy intensity changes with age; periodic tune-ups at key milestones (school entry, adolescence) are common. Musculoskeletal Key

12) Does it affect other organs?
K–L syndrome is described chiefly as a limb/nail pattern. Clinicians still examine the whole child; associated anomalies are better characterized in related entities like ectrodactyly. Genetic Diseases Center+1

13) What about prosthetics?
Task-specific devices can help with certain grips; many children do well without them. A prosthetist-OT team can advise. OccupationalTherapy.com

14) Can we prevent infections around small/absent nails?
Yes—good skin care, avoiding biting/picking, trimming smoothly, and protection during wet work/chemicals help a lot. Medscape+1

15) Where can I read the original description?
The classic report is by Kumar & Levick (1986) in Clinical Genetics, and GARD summarizes the phenotype in plain language. PubMed+1

Disclaimer: Each person’s journey is unique, treatment planlife stylefood habithormonal conditionimmune systemchronic disease condition, geological location, weather and previous medical  history is also unique. So always seek the best advice from a qualified medical professional or health care provider before trying any treatments to ensure to find out the best plan for you. This guide is for general information and educational purposes only. Regular check-ups and awareness can help to manage and prevent complications associated with these diseases conditions. If you or someone are suffering from this disease condition bookmark this website or share with someone who might find it useful! Boost your knowledge and stay ahead in your health journey. We always try to ensure that the content is regularly updated to reflect the latest medical research and treatment options. Thank you for giving your valuable time to read the article.

The article is written by Team RxHarun and reviewed by the Rx Editorial Board Members

Last Updated: September 19, 2025.

 

      RxHarun
      Logo
      Register New Account